Epistemic Alignment Audit dashboard

Participants

- waiting for responses -

Alignment score

0–100 scale vs declared

Largest gap

magnitude 0.00

Dimensions with consensus

low variance within group

Declared vs held, ten-dimensional radar

Solid line: declared. Dashed: group mean.

Divergence hotspots

Dimensions ranked by absolute gap between declared and group mean. Top rows are the conversation.

Per-dimension view

Bars run from Pole A (−1) to Pole B (+1). Hollow marker: declared. Solid marker: group mean.

Espoused vs enacted

The gap the audit exists to surface: what staff say they believe (direct-agreement items) against what their scenario choices reveal in practice. Where the two part company is where stated values are not yet lived, the most productive place to look.

Top dialogic prompt

Auto-generated from the highest-gap dimension. Intended as the opening prompt for the facilitated dialogue that follows the dashboard review.

Take the survey

Forty-five items, roughly twenty to twenty-five minutes. Responses are anonymous. On submission, your responses are added to the aggregate shown on the Live Dashboard tab.

Reminder. The declared position is not the correct answer, the instrument maps an ecology; it does not grade your place in it. Please answer from practice, not from what you think the organisation wants.

Thank you, response recorded.

Your ten-dimensional epistemic signature has been added to the aggregate.

Your epistemic signature

Session data

Responses persist in your browser session. Use export to save a backup, or to combine responses from multiple devices.

Responses recorded

Organisation setup

Configure the dashboard for your organisation. Saved to your account and shared across every device that opens this dashboard.

Organisation name

Mission & vision statement

Paste your organisation's mission and vision here. This is the source text the declared baseline is coded from, the position your statement actually commits to.

You can also paste guiding statements or text copied from your school's website. The statement is kept as the record of what was declared; the reading of it is yours to make on the sliders below.

Declared position

Where your declared philosophy sits on each dimension, from −1 (Pole A) to +1 (Pole B). Read your statement against each dimension and set the slider where you judge it sits. Coding it yourself is the work: the disagreement it provokes among leaders is the first finding.

Baseline team

The leadership or management team who set this declared baseline. Record who took part and their role, then email each of them the audit link so their own positions are mapped against the baseline they helped define.

Saved ✓

Share the survey

Both links read the declared position saved above. Staff responses feed the aggregate on the Live Dashboard; new-hire responses stay private to the interviewer and return a fit read against the same ten dimensions.

Staff survey link

New-hire screening link

Candidates screened

- no screenings yet -

Close fits

fit ≥ 70, at most one flag

Declared position set?

from Setup

New-hire screening

Everyone who completed your new-hire screening link (new-hire.html?s=…&kind=candidate). Fit is each candidate's proximity to your declared position across the ten dimensions, decision-support for the interview, not a pass/fail gate. Names and emails are visible only to you.

About this instrument

This dashboard operationalises the live-session phase of the Epistemic Alignment Audit. It measures the coherence between a school's declared philosophy, coded from its vision, mission, and guiding statements, and the epistemologies actually held by its teachers, across ten dimensions.

Forty-five items probe positions on those dimensions using indirect methods: scenario forced-choice, prototype selection, priority ranking, resource allocation, paired declared-versus-enacted items, and open-ended prompts. Results are aggregated in real time against the organisation's declared vector.

Session workflow

Open the dashboard on a shared screen.
Each staff member takes the survey on their own device, or pass a single device around the room.
The dashboard updates after each submission. Review the radar, hotspots, and per-dimension view together.
Use the top dialogic prompt as the opening question for the facilitated conversation that follows.
End with one commitment, one dimension the organisation will inquire into over the term ahead.

The ten dimensions

Ethical non-negotiables

Anonymity, no participant identifiers collected.
No evaluative use, results must not inform performance management.
Voluntary participation, partial responses are valid partial data.
Interpretive humility, the declared position is not automatically the correct one.